COM vs GOV vs ORG

Great kid's movie; anything important in there
about life? ...

... a good path, a good end, and a good conscience?  

Perhaps the best revelation of modern game theory and organizational economics is that productive labor relationships only work well over a long-term, good-faith pathway.  The participants must get to know and trust each other. As in a marriage, the employer and employee are motivated to do the right thing not because of an immediate reward or simple self-interest but because their values and goals are aligned, they anticipate remaining together for the long haul and achieving good outcomes.  There's an issue of mutual conscience that is satisfied in such a relationship.

From the children's story, an
extraordinarily important issue,
and even more so in today's
business environment ...

Simply said, "Can two walk together except they be agreed?"  "Do two people walk hand in hand if they aren't going to the same place?"

Those of us blessed with the opportunity to work are aware of the choices.  We hope to serve with a good heart to a good end, and with people of like mind.  

How is it going with your employer?  Is it taking you where you, in good conscience, want to go?  In it, can you serve well and to good purpose? 

Perspective

If you had to make it on $25k/yr, where would that put you on a world scale? (Top 2%)

At twice that amount, the median U.S. household income is stunning at around $50,000, with one or perhaps two wage earners.

Friends in Kenya; it's grasshopper season, so the
kids are out with sticks to catch a few.
If their families take in $800/yr,
they're above the median
in the community.
They're normal
in this world.

And what about the rest of the world?

Is there insight here that might help us shape our own lives and priorities?
  
What do we teach our children about such things as wealth and privilege?

Just how big an issue is this anyway?  Should I be be concerned?

Words

A few days down the road, or a decade, little that was said is remembered.

At work, at home, at school, on the road, we have opportunity every day.

That includes today, as my wise wife reminds me.  Got a goal for today?

OK so making the graphic was entertaining. 
It's my father's legacy, "Talk less, do more."

President's Choice

In the U.S. capitol, our president was dissatisfied with the food service, so he brought in a chef and culinary staff from his home state.

The chef orchestrated elaborate banquets at the presidents home until a problem arose.  Uncle Harkless (or Hercules, as he was known) was a slave, and the law in Pennsylvania required slaves to be freed after six months of residence.  The nation's capitol being in Philadelphia at the time, President George Washington was obliged to set Hercules free, but instead he sent him back to Mount Vernon along with the other kitchen slaves.

President Washington had sworn to never buy another slave, but he sent the staff back to Virginia just short of the six-months residency, intending to return them to Philadelphia after a few weeks.

Hercules eventually escaped from Mount Vernon and was never heard from again.

Louis-Philippe, the future king of France, visited Mount Vernon in the spring of 1797.  According to his diary entry:

The general's cook ran away... and left a little daughter of six at Mount Vernon. Beaudoin ventured that the little girl must be deeply upset that she would never see her father again; she answered, "Oh! Sir, I am very glad, because he is free now."

George Washington was the first among our presidents to make a callous decision based on self-interest at the expense of another.  Slavery dictated  how Hercules and his wife and children would live their entire lives.  When it could have been rectified by the choice of a gracious heart, it was not.

George Washington was a good guy, of course.  He freed his slaves in his will, all 124 of them.  There were 153 more that belonged to Martha Washington that were part of her estate when she died.  Because of property laws, the children of Hercules and his wife remained enslaved and are presumed to have died at Mt. Vernon.

Later presidents have made similar choices.  Viewed in isolated retrospect, the choices were selfish, perhaps shameful. The judgment of history is harsh and laments the broken lives left in their wake.

And it's more fun to get this one right, 

of course; to be a help bringer instead 

of a fight-winner.  GA.5.22

We all do the same kinds of things, do we not?  Choosing selfishly without a second thought is the easiest way, and doing otherwise has a price.  We may not get the attention of history, but the choice and effects remain.

We might ask if our impact today will be a noble one.  

It's a 'life now' question that can open a thousand doors.

Half Chance

If you marry, you've got about a 50/50 chance it will end in divorce. True?  No, although that's the popularly offered forecast.  And the numbers are the same for churched folks?  Also not true.

From the U.S. Census Bureau (see table 6, right) we find a different picture.

If you were to check on folks at perhaps age 70, odds are about 96% that they will have gotten married.  Their odds for divorce are 23% or less. (23% for men, 21% for women.)

That's 70%+ of first marriages that did not end in divorce. 

And for church folks? Overall, regular church attendance lowers the divorce rate anywhere from 25-50%, depending on the study you look at. (Barna/Feldhahn)

For the record, there's a continuing battle over the interpretation of such statistics with varying validity in many arguments dealing with age, education, race, cohort, and so on.  The popular media doesn't offer a helpful analysis. The numbers are there for you to peruse yourself, if you like.  You'll have to dig a bit, but those particular facts persists across the studies.

The important part is that marriage can work.  There are a hundred obstacles, a thousand changes, a million landmines along the way, it seems.  We understand, and it hurts deeply when such troubles touch us and our families, our friends.  But marriage wins on points; it's the better path, the greater good.

Mom and dad, decades 

along the pathway.
They're the norm.

Imagine the difference; to be able to tell a struggling couple, “Most people get through this, and you can too.”

Imagine equipping young folks with the ability to counter the cynical statements of college professors or the “why bother getting married” comments of friends, with the actuality that most marriages last a lifetime.

It does raise the question; why would our culture accept the worst possible interpretation of something so great?

What's Fair?

The debate over raising the minimum wage brings out some strong opinions.

The rant (left, attributed to the Tea Party) made the rounds on Facebook with 149,633 liking it and 192,573 folks re-sharing it on their own timelines.  It got 9000 comments.  It's perhaps representative of one side of public opinion.

The reality is that the minimum wage has lost ground over the years just in purchasing power.  If measured against productivity, it's about half what it was in 1963.

The 1938  Fair Labor Standards Act banned oppressive child labor and set the minimum hourly wage at 25 cents, and the maximum workweek at 44 hours.¹  It was a beginning, addressing the economic enslavement and abuse of some for the benefit of others.

When I was a kid, minimum wage was what I expected starting out in the grocery store bagging groceries.  It was years later that I discovered it was there to protect adults in the workplace as well.

Today's job market is pretty tight, and progress can be slow.  Paying for college or recovering from a lost job, it isn't easy to fight your way up from entry level.  And the minimum wage we pay today is worth less than it was when times were easier, economically.

The growing gap between rich and poor illustrates the issue more broadly.  In an industry where productivity has quintupled along with profits, workers make less than a decade ago.  Same issue.