"World Population"

We all know that living things need resources in order to survive. We often, however, don't make the connection that the amount of available resources dictates the size of a population – 

that a population will grow when resources are in surplus, decline when resources are scarce, and stabilize when the population is at the maximum level that can be sustained.  It smoothes out generally like the S-curve here (right).

There are a number of complex variables, but the results are understandable.  Continuous growth depends on unlimited resources.  Equilibrium comes with a balance of population and resources.  Overshoot and oscillation  occurs with fluctuating resource events like drought and flood and marketplace upheavals.  Collapse comes when resources are used and not renewed.

Human population is on a steep J-curve rise based on our aggressive exploitation of resources. We're bringing water, food, power, raw materials in at an accelerating pace, and population responds accordingly, particularly urban population.

It's not a smooth path across the globe. Oscillations occur regionally with drought and flood, earthquake and marketplace upheavals, things that interrupt the flow of resources.  The world's rich don't feel the inherent distress others do.  The poor are affected the most.

Do we know what resources will be available to support human population? Do we know which ones are not being replaced at an adequate rate to support our current consumption?  Of course we do.

Change is certain.  

• Caught in the Crosshairs: Wildlife Faces the Population Challenge
• Demographic Facts of Life
• Fishing for a Solution to the Population Problem
• Population: 7 Billion
• Population and Climate Change: A Clear Link
• Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Population and Deforestation
• Ten Population and Environment Connections
• The Perfect Disaster: Man vs. Nature
• The Thirsty Billion: Population and Water
• Unsustainable Suburban Sprawl
• Wildlife Feeling the Population Squeeze

• Diffusing the Population "Bomb": Demography and Security 
• Population: 7 Billion
• Population Growth and Food Insecurity
• The Fifth Largest Country: International Migrants
• Teen Childbearing in the United States

• What Will $1 Billion Buy?

Billions of babies

In 1810, one billion; in 1930, two billion; in 1960, three billion, in 1980, four billion; in 1990, five billion.

In 1999, just at the end of the millennium, our numbers hit SIX billion. 

(Update) In 2011, we reached SEVEN billion.  Curious what's happening?

For our entire existence, there's been plenty of room and resources.  We were nomads, and there were never more than a few million of us on Earth at any one time.  Until recently, anyway.

Modern humans spread across Africa and began to spill out into the Middle East around 100,000 years ago.  Populations were established in Europe and Asia by 40,000 and 30,000 years ago, respectively.  We reached the southern tip of South America and settled in around 12,000 years ago.

Folks settled down a bit for tending crops and herds.  At the dawn of agriculture, about 10,000 years ago, the world's population was perhaps five million or so.  Numbers increased oh so slowly until just a few years ago.

Today, hundreds of cities and hundreds more of urban areas have more than a million inhabitants each, and populations continue to skyrocket. Take a look at the recent changes and the forecast for 2050.  Things will change, of course.  

The fascinating question is regarding where the limits might be.  Can we produce enough food?  Can we provide education and medical care?  Can we govern justly?  All the high-intensity issues are amplified by the now densely populated world.

Provocative questions ...

Christianity, Religion, & Politics

Is Christianity relevant today?

         What are the viable remnants of that faith?

How much of today's Christianity is related to the original?

       The name is retained; what else?

Does Christianity require democracy?

Can a politician be a Christian? Or vice versa?

Does Christianity encourage capitalism?

Answers at the bottom of the page, but no fair jumping ahead.

Christianity has been formative for American culture, or so we're told by early writers of our nation's story. Interestingly, and perhaps more accurately, western Christian practices and western culture have shaped each other over the centuries.

Despite the rise of the religious right, there's a long-term estrangement between early Christian and modern American values that is visible and growing.  "The Republican and Democratic parties are not merely uncomfortable, imperfect, homes for people of faith; they are prisons that artificially divide us and prevent us from coming together as a community to advance the common good."  A Christian alternative to America's broken political duopoly - Michael Stafford

But God is on our side, right?

Joshua had the same question for the sword wielding fellow he saw outside Jericho.  He asked, "Are you on our side or theirs?"  "Neither," came the answer, "but as the captain of the Lord's army have I come."  Read that as, "I didn't come to take sides, I came to take over."

No, God is not on our side.  

     The relevant question, are we on His?  

           How do we get there?

So then, the questions:

Is Christianity relevant?  
Of course it is, but perhaps the church has some catching up to do.

What remnant of the original remains?  
All of it.  Religious practices come and go, but the central elements of Christianity remain unchanged.

How much of American Christianity is related to the original?
The real thing is a small core surrounded by a whirlwind of life issues; how do I live in this culture or context, how can I serve His purposes in this time and place.  It's a stronghold of extraordinary peace surrounded by a blinding conflagration of violence and trouble, turmoil and fury; it's your refuge, your fortress.

Does Christianity require democracy?  
No.  Nor even personal freedom.  Nor denominations, nor massive organizations, nor hierarchies, nor authoritarian rule ...

Can a politician be a Christian, or vice versa?  
Sure; in Him, all things are possible.  These days though, even He might have some reservations.  :)

Does Christianity encourage capitalism?  
No.  Nor personal property nor the pursuit thereof.  

Are those things wrong?  No, they're just not necessary parts of a life of faith.  Sometimes, they might even be an encumbrance.

So, what are we going to do with what we know?

Most Powerful Good

The most powerfully good thing you might ever do is, just for a moment, care for another and do something for their betterment.  Anything.

(Kenya photo: our Guruguru kids - January 2013)

It doesn't take much to meet an important need in another's life.  It might be your child or another's.  A word of encouragement, a meal, a helping hand.  For some, a year's tuition ($40-$80) can make the difference, or a week's food ($7) perhaps.

Click here for a suggestion ...

There are many more like this one.

Easily done; just noticing and then doing.  
World changers, help bringers  ... powerful stuff from a simple choice.

Luke 10:25-37

Don't read this part.  It's from Einstein and others, and it's difficult.

The most powerfully destructive thing you might ever do in your lifetime is to see such a simple need and turn away.  Doing so destroys your soul as you choose your own distractions and mindless pleasures over the real life so close to hand.  Doing so consigns the one you see to the fringe, to the disenfranchised, to the unheard.  You've decided that you are the center of the universe after all, and in so doing, forfeited your own humanity.


I remember a fellow I worked with years ago.  We were talking about need in the developing world, and he was trying to persuade me he was a giving sort of person, I suppose.  He bragged about chipping in $20 in the collection plate when he went to church.  He didn't go often.  Considering his income, I don't think that really qualified as caring about others.

“Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well-being of a person or animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we inflict on our soul when we look the other way.”

~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

Excuses for the inexcusable ...

(NC-17 subject) .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

WHY? BECAUSE F*** YOU, THAT'S WHY.

This particular expression of frustration is interestingly common across the less refined and more vocal segments of our culture.  Don't Google it unless you're ready for the flood of anger and imagery.  The real world we live in is a little rough around the edges.

Curious why such thinking might be so prevalent?

From Washington to Wall Street, folks find themselves fed up with excuses for the inexcusable.  One more reason for banker bonuses, one more excuse for Congress failing to pass a budget, one more reason for the multi-trillion dollar debt, ... none deserves a considered response; profanity seems the only fitting answer left to us.  Congress doesn't represent the citizenry, Wall Street doesn't serve the marketplace, our votes no longer count, and corporations own our government.  It's the answer they deserve; that's why.  At least that seems to be the thinking expressed.

These are interesting times from which we'll eventually emerge, of course, but popular culture informs us.  There are many things which will need to be dealt with, one way or another. 

Considering government's recent record, the anti-Christ would be an understandably popular alternative for many, as has been humorously pointed out a few times.

Dissent and change, frustration and protest, government and the governed, all are wonderful players in the human laboratory.  Our hope is that such conflict and the inevitable change it provokes will be beneficial.  Will it?  Judging from today, what are the best options available?

Comparatively speaking, our country is young still.  Following its first throes of shaping and learning, it finds itself troubled by the same issues which brought down great nations and empires.  Overspending at the expense of the citizenry, a rapidly rising gap between rich and poor, power serving itself, hubris and megalomania, we've seen it all in the history books.  

So what's next?  
               Thoughts? 

Welcome to Wall $treet

In the U.S., the average individual wage earner makes around $34K.  

On Wall $treet, the average income was recently reported as $362K. They're well paid and immune to prosecution, apparently.  Too big to jail, as has been said in halfhearted protest.

Until the world's financial marketplace is perhaps disassembled and rebuilt from scratch, we are faced with a well-equipped battle force with an impressive record of conquest, plundering, and indirect deaths now exceeding millions.

The suggestion to 'enter at your own risk' is sarcasm, of course; you can't get far enough away to be safe.

There's currently no place on earth that is safe from their reach.  Estimated deaths in sub-Saharan Africa range from 1.1 to 2.4 million from the world marketplace crash in '08/'09.  They're no longer with us, and Wall $treet has faced not one conviction, not one prosecution, not one admission of wrongdoing.  

If such things cause you concern, write your congressman before moving on.  Or drop a note to the White House at http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact