The Price of Civil·(human)·ization

• Should the wealthy be taxed more than the poor?
• Should benefit programs favor the lower income group?
• Should a retiree who has paid little into Social Security get a larger percentage return on what they've paid?
• Should low wage earners be subsidised for living expenses?

The math is simple.
If I earn and save, I should be able to keep it all.  If I work diligently and deserve the income I receive, I earned it, nobody else did.  That's the common conservative position, and it's a valid start point.

The one who works, earns, and saves does in fact deserve the return of their labor, of their disciplined thrift and saving.

The story gets a bit more complex when you consider how they arrived at that place of success.  None succeed without help along the way.  Opportunity isn't equal despite our efforts.  Some get the good education, the good employment opportunity, the safe neighborhood where they can enjoy a quiet evening while they do their homework.  Some manage to get through college, scrabbling for enough to live while they do it.  Others make their way into a trade and develop skills that are in demand.  They have a way forward.

Others try just as hard, but the door doesn't open.  Some live where they can afford to, often in troublesome neighborhoods with street crime and violence.  School work suffers when parental supervision is limited by multiple jobs or a missing spouse.  Childhood development suffers when the top influence is a gang culture. Or poverty.  No one chooses to be poor, to not have enough for a healthy diet or a decent education.

Helping those in need -- the underlying principle is recognition of fairness, of equity.  None of us get to choose where or when we're born, the cultural and economic circumstances in which we are raised, yet our humanity requires of us that we care for one another, and that means freely receiving and giving help.

Difficulties can arise when help becomes an impersonal program rather than a personal offer.  Programs can lack the elements of brotherhood and encouragement, and they can produce less than impressive results.  The one helped doesn't get the friend walking alongside that they need and that could be such a help.

That said, do those in need deserve help?  Of course.  The larger question, are those who've accumulated wealth obligated to help others?

It's not about being nice, it's the larger issue of doing what is right.  Is that true?
(Ever wonder why we have wheelchair ramps?  It's not because we're being nice.)

In the marketplace, each echelon is built on the backs of those below. That's the way money works.  It's a bit nonsensical to suggest that the wealth of some didn't come from the efforts of others.

Interestingly, if you take wealth out of the model, the pyramid collapses, and people quickly become the same in every aspect.








__________________________________________________________
Now consider American Capitalism and American Socialism.
Or perhaps The 'Why' of In-group Thinking

Temporary Insanity - the Teen Years

Teens are nuts occasionally, at least according to parental reports.    Is there a cure?

Over coffee at work, my friend tells me about her young daughter.  She'd had a meltdown when told to add a clothing item to what she was wearing.  The rule was about tights (jeggings?) being worn with a skirt; it's Mom's standard for propriety.  When the youngster was reminded of the requirement, she exploded in profuse tears, began throwing clothing out of her closet and around her room, wailing, "I don't have anything to wear!" She's ten years old.

Two things worth our notice.
First.  The transition to adulthood is underway in the pre-teen years -- and it opens up an unknown realm for the emerging person.  Never having done it before, you now want to categorize and orchestrate the parts of life yourself. Difficulties emerge with the discovery that everything is of absolute maximum importance!  E.g., "I can't find my socks! My life is over!"

It takes a few years for a youngster to sort out what's important and what's not, what deserves a fifteen second discussion and what deserves a few days of deliberation.  Youthful inexperience can lead to tantrum events where unimportant details get undeserved attention.  (Data tags still needed: priority, precedence, significance, relevance, context, granularity, and so on.)

Second.  Okay, the second thing is that kids begin learning the process of discussion and negotiation long before their own verbal skills are fully developed.*  They hear adult conversation and acquire huge chunks of information about how to make a point or get a result.  It's just pieces of life skill they notice and file away without any deliberation or evaluation.

Analysis:

Cause: kids in transition are learning to be adults, managing the details of life, but everything is super-important until they learn otherwise.

Cure: demonstrate and teach the skills of negotiation and good manners.  Do it deliberately, beginning in the very early years, and compliment them when they get it right.  Please and thank you, "Mother, may I?", "Would it be ok if...?"; all of that is the 'how' of dealing with things.  When a mega-boom happens, de-escalate.  Talk it through calmly in practical terms of importance and problem solving.

Safety Note:  avoid escalation, anger, and the power play.  They separate the participants and make matters worse by lessening your access to your child's learning process.  On the other side, getting it right can be an extraordinarily positive experience for parent and child and bring them closer.  A quick review of how mom and dad handle life details might be helpful.

The young mom telling me about her ten-year-old (above) was laughing at how bizarrely difficult it is to be a parent. Mom is a professional, accustomed to problem solving and decision making, but she notes that kids don't come with an instruction manual.  Fortunately, Grandma was around that morning to lend a hand.  A few minutes after she left for work, Mom got a text from Grandma, "She had five pieces of toast.  Everything is fine now.  P.S. You need bread."

There's lots of fun along the way.  The ten-year old girl mentioned has an older brother who spends hours on the phone with his friends discussing relationships with girls, what to do, what it means when she says this or that, and how to impress, giving each other advice.  He's twelve. Giving each other advice!  But that's another story.

*An eighteen-month old toddler was playing on the floor while her mom and dad and friends chatted about travel pictures scrolling by on the wall screen, places they'd been and things they'd seen.  When Mom used the term "travel pictures", the toddler began walking around and waving her hands with a big smile saying excitedly, "I traveling, I traveling!"  Small children enjoy listening to adult conversation, and they grasp much more than you might expect.

You might appreciate Mommy Wisdom

The Goal in 96 Seconds

Cahoots, and other places

Back to work after a few days with good friends in a distant, quiet place.  Peaceful, but too brief.

Conformed

Or not, perhaps.  

We've been carried along for quite a distance. Any chance of recovery?

Choosing to go counter-common is high-risk and a guarantee of difficulty.  Should we even make the attempt?

None of us are normal, centered, or balanced in our understanding. Each is bent by culture and circumstance, by self and others, even after a lifetime of thoughtful growth and refined thinking.

The very best we might hope for is continued instruction and breaking change where we're the part that gets broken.  How many things could be profitably broken out of our thinking?

• self things that shouldn't come first
• status things that shouldn't matter
• winning ... when coming alongside is the better choice
• judging ... when understanding might make a difference
• looking down on others as though we were above, somehow
• reaching for more ... when giving would be so much better

Even at our best, we don't get it right every time.  Each still has room for more change, and getting it right, even just occasionally, is such a joy.

Preaching to myself again.

Short attention span

Competition for our attention often leaves us with information overload.

How do we solve the problem?         

There are things that deserve more thought than others, we know.  Our environment can pile on distractions, however, from short story sequences on the news to interruptions on top of interruptions at school or the office.

Have you noticed?

Advertisers don't do long commercials any more.  Now you get five or ten commercials in what used to be a short break with just one.


If you're still reading this and haven't wandered off, you're unusually focused.

Does such a torrent of distraction and information derail our lives?  Of course it does.  Much like interrupting a language course interferes with our desired mastery, our cultural norm of continual subject change interrupts the productivity of a dedicated life. Chances are, years may pass with little progress where it's needed.  (This is an actual simulation of the modern distraction model.)

Change the outcome.  Know your goals, invest significantly and practically in the values you've chosen.  Deliberately get up and do instead of sitting and talking.  And forgetting.

  Schedule it and follow through.

We have to fight a bit to get above the distraction, don't we.


(He said, preaching yet again to himself)